40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-48.13%
Revenue decline while CNQ shows 44.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
5.86%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 4.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-69.85%
Gross profit decline while CNQ shows 1310.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-41.87%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 936.76% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
G&A growth less than half of CNQ's 331.58%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
114.83%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CNQ's 1700.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
42.36%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CNQ's 9.25%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.16%
Interest expense growth less than half of CNQ's 6.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.33%
D&A growth while CNQ reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-90.23%
EBITDA decline while CNQ shows 324.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.62%
EBITDA margin decline while CNQ shows 41.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.77%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 1269.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.32%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 908.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
54.86%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CNQ's 97.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-125.95%
Pre-tax income decline while CNQ shows 235.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.04%
Pre-tax margin decline while CNQ shows 193.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.94%
Tax expense reduction while CNQ shows 310.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-123.79%
Net income decline while CNQ shows 223.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.86%
Net margin decline while CNQ shows 185.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
EPS decline while CNQ shows 225.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
Diluted EPS decline while CNQ shows 225.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.12%
Share count increase while CNQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.89%
Diluted share increase while CNQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.