40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.95%
Revenue decline while CNQ shows 11.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
5.80%
Cost growth 50-75% of CNQ's 10.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-18.89%
Gross profit decline while CNQ shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.92%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 0.16% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.84%
G&A reduction while CNQ shows 32.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.67%
Other expenses reduction while CNQ shows 8.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.30%
Operating expenses reduction while CNQ shows 23.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.57%
Total costs growth less than half of CNQ's 11.34%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.44%
D&A growth less than half of CNQ's 9.10%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-25.75%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.45%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 10.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-61.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.29%
Tax expense reduction while CNQ shows 126.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-55.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.10%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.10%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.20%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.20%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.