PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.35%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.37%
Cost growth less than half of CNQ's 8.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-31.93%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
G&A reduction while CNQ shows 150.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.76%
Operating expenses reduction while CNQ shows 101.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.57%
Total costs reduction while CNQ shows 11.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.02%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.94%
D&A growth less than half of CNQ's 8.70%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-30.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
90.34%
EBITDA margin growth while CNQ declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-108.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
67.48%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x CNQ's 60.64%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
-135.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-244.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-104.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.13%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.05%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.85%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.02%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.