40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Revenue growth below 50% of CNQ's 32.96%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
19.71%
Cost growth above 1.5x CNQ's 12.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.67%
Gross profit decline while CNQ shows 105.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.27%
Margin decline while CNQ shows 54.89% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.31%
G&A reduction while CNQ shows 114.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.82%
Other expenses reduction while CNQ shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.76%
Operating expenses reduction while CNQ shows 77.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.87%
Total costs growth 50-75% of CNQ's 14.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
22.50%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CNQ's 5.06%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
16.08%
D&A growth above 1.5x CNQ's 9.48%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
4.68%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CNQ's 44.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.58%
EBITDA margin decline while CNQ shows 23.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.05%
Operating income decline while CNQ shows 110.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.44%
Operating margin decline while CNQ shows 58.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.28%
Other expenses growth while CNQ reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.07%
Pre-tax income decline while CNQ shows 77.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.55%
Pre-tax margin decline while CNQ shows 33.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-112.87%
Tax expense reduction while CNQ shows 159.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.83%
Net income growth below 50% of CNQ's 60.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.81%
Net margin growth 50-75% of CNQ's 20.50%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.63%
EPS growth below 50% of CNQ's 61.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.70%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CNQ's 61.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.74%
Share count increase while CNQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.17%
Diluted share increase while CNQ reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.