40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-44.93%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-34.69%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 12.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-66.71%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.99%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.84%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.02%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRK's 23.30%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-29.68%
Total costs reduction while CRK shows 19.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.99%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.84%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-64.09%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-103.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
872.69%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-70.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.48%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-71.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.30%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.14%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.