40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.27%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-14.19%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.09%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.12%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.70%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-7.48%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.03%
D&A growth while CRK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.15%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 3.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-149.12%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-7.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.87%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.09%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.36%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.63%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 8.82% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-8.96%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 1.55% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.