40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.16%
Similar revenue growth to CRK's 3.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
17.38%
Cost increase while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-17.99%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 8.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.50%
Margin decline while CRK shows 4.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
G&A growth while CRK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.78%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 6.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.88%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 4.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.20%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRK's 1.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-10.40%
Interest expense reduction while CRK shows 11.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of CRK's 6.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.25%
EBITDA decline while CRK shows 10.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.74%
EBITDA margin decline while CRK shows 6.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.00%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 8.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.35%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 11.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.70%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-86.60%
Pre-tax income decline while CRK shows 4.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRK shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.05%
Tax expense reduction while CRK shows 44.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-89.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.63%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRK's 0.07%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.