40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.48%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 6.20%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-5.64%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 1.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
32.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 7.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.22%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRK's 0.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.82%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.43%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 4.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.30%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 3.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.75%
Total costs reduction while CRK shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.94%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.87%
D&A growth less than half of CRK's 3.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1.82%
EBITDA decline while CRK shows 0.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.23%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 1.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.94%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 44.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.61%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 35.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
483.54%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.20%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.09%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
332.43%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CRK's 34.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.93%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.