PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.84%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 3.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.13%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 0.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-38.48%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 189.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.32%
Margin decline while CRK shows 180.33% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
G&A growth while CRK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.18%
Operating expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.08%
Total costs growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.42%
Interest expense growth less than half of CRK's 6.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.52%
D&A reduction while CRK shows 0.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-43.56%
EBITDA decline while CRK shows 11.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.40%
EBITDA margin decline while CRK shows 12.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.06%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 49.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.46%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 51.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.92%
Other expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-71.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
79.92%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.75%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.30%
Share count increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.30%
Diluted share increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.