40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
43.89%
Positive growth while CRK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
68.17%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRK's 6.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
30.11%
Positive growth while CRK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.85%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7262.50%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 471.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.82%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 101.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.29%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRK's 13.28%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.02%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRK's 0.98%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
19.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRK's 5.75%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
5.49%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 0.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
130.06%
EBITDA margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.64%
Operating income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.00%
Operating margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1768.97%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 89.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
528.07%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
336.49%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
159.17%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
935.79%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
619.84%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.86%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.86%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count change of 0.01% while CRK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.