40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
63.91%
Positive growth while CRK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.63%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
467.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 74.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
324.06%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x CRK's 76.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.70%
G&A reduction while CRK shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRK's 5533.33%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-15.95%
Operating expenses reduction while CRK shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.79%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of CRK's 22.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-17.65%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
70.04%
EBITDA growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
151.65%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRK's 5.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
62.90%
Operating income growth below 50% of CRK's 216.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
77.36%
Operating margin growth below 50% of CRK's 218.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
61.85%
Pre-tax income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.72%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-113.27%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
65.30%
Net income growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.83%
Net margin growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.32%
EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.32%
Diluted EPS growth while CRK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.