PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 0.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRK's 9.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-33.60%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
G&A growth while CRK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.11%
Other expenses reduction while CRK shows 88.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
14.90%
Operating expenses growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.91%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRK's 9.06%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.79%
Interest expense growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.96%
D&A growth less than half of CRK's 11.29%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-60.49%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-162.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-167.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-254.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-267.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
160.23%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-166.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-172.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-166.39%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.10%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.23%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.84%
Diluted share reduction while CRK shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.