40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.58%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
33.60%
Cost increase while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-40.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
G&A reduction while CRK shows 3.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-39.46%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.75%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.70%
Interest expense growth while CRK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.93%
D&A growth while CRK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-27.33%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.37%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-44.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
156.00%
Tax expense growth while CRK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.83%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.29%
Share count reduction while CRK shows 11.72% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.63%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.