40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.85%
Revenue decline while CRK shows 20.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.06%
Cost reduction while CRK shows 0.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.81%
Gross profit decline while CRK shows 115.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.11%
Margin expansion below 50% of CRK's 113.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.43%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.91%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of CRK's 103.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
64.58%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRK's 2.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
21.65%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRK's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.91%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRK's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-10.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-55.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.62%
Operating income decline while CRK shows 96.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.60%
Operating margin decline while CRK shows 97.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-432.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-118.10%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-180.39%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-111.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.92%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.46%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.95%
Share count increase while CRK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.40%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.