40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-44.93%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 32.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-34.69%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 33.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-66.71%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 32.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-39.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.99%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 13.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.02%
Operating expenses growth less than half of EQT's 36.34%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-29.68%
Total costs reduction while EQT shows 33.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.99%
Similar D&A growth to EQT's 23.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-64.09%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 26.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.57%
EBITDA margin decline while EQT shows 7.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.66%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 27.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-103.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
872.69%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-70.58%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 12.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.48%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 40.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-71.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.30%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.14%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 94.97% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.