40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.21%
Revenue growth below 50% of EQT's 33.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
39.02%
Similar cost growth to EQT's 40.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-11.05%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 24.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.17%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 6.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-5.90%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.76%
Total costs growth 50-75% of EQT's 28.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.36%
D&A growth while EQT reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.71%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 35.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.02%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 68.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.70%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 26.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-292.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-56.11%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 46.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.89%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 10.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-245.23%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 57.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.12%
Net income decline while EQT shows 41.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.03%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 6.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.67%
EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 40.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.51%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 37.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.18%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.90%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 2.38% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.