40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.24%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 27.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.67%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 25.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
31.24%
Similar gross profit growth to EQT's 30.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
37.04%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x EQT's 2.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
710.60%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 31.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
345.38%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.07%
Total costs growth above 1.5x EQT's 13.87%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.22%
D&A growth above 1.5x EQT's 19.88%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-21.56%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 63.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.60%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of EQT's 136.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-45.79%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 15.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-961.59%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 83.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-110.35%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 90.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 49.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.75%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 121.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-101.74%
Net income decline while EQT shows 76.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.82%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 38.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.90%
EPS decline while EQT shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.81%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 74.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.67%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-5.89%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 1.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.