PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.15%
Positive growth while EQT shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.28%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.37%
Similar gross profit growth to EQT's 8.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-2.47%
Margin decline while EQT shows 10.51% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
19.00%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of EQT's 27.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
17.29%
Total costs growth above 1.5x EQT's 0.58%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 0.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-38.64%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.43%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of EQT's 80.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.15%
Similar operating income growth to EQT's 2.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-8.02%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 4.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
96.83%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-68.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.94%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.81%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.