40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.61%
Revenue growth 50-75% of EQT's 53.40%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-57.78%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 80.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
104.36%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 27.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
46.38%
Margin expansion while EQT shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.66%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 4.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
157.95%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 21.50%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.11%
Total costs growth less than half of EQT's 66.36%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
Similar D&A growth to EQT's 4.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
53.25%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 24.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
319.57%
EBITDA margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.08%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 29.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
28.27%
Operating margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-109.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.34%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 1.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.50%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 1.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.63%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.99%
EPS decline while EQT shows 1.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.66%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.