40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.68%
Revenue growth below 50% of EQT's 51.97%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
37.03%
Cost growth 50-75% of EQT's 61.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-15.05%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 43.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-16.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.15%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.25%
Operating expenses growth less than half of EQT's 5.51%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.47%
Total costs growth 50-75% of EQT's 42.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.52%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-17.05%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 57.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
32.12%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 3.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-50.68%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 79.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.50%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 17.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-95.89%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 4.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-48.11%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 100.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 31.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.35%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 75.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-51.59%
Net income decline while EQT shows 127.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.39%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 49.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.72%
EPS decline while EQT shows 130.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.93%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 130.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.56%
Share count change of 11.56% while EQT is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
9.59%
Diluted share increase while EQT reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.