40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-38.37%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 37.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.12%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 74.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-62.05%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 4.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-38.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.20%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 15.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-24.30%
Operating expenses reduction while EQT shows 2253.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.87%
Total costs reduction while EQT shows 142.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.04%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 15.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-58.15%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.53%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-73.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.59%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-69.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.70%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.64%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.