40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-40.99%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 44.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.14%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 87.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-58.48%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 29.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-29.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.11%
G&A change of 36.11% while EQT maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.92%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.54%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 9.09%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.20%
Total costs growth less than half of EQT's 39.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.38%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.99%
D&A growth less than half of EQT's 8.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-68.61%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 33.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-125.13%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 52.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.58%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 5.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
202.50%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 29.74%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-119.29%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 97.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.68%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 36.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-144.28%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 92.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-106.93%
Net income decline while EQT shows 100.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.74%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 38.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-107.07%
EPS decline while EQT shows 104.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-107.25%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 104.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.