40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-34.02%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 14.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.43%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 15.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-49.00%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 12.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-22.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
383.87%
G&A change of 383.87% while EQT maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while EQT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-99.24%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 9.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.81%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.16%
Total costs growth 50-75% of EQT's 6.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
4.48%
Interest expense growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.24%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 3.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-70.93%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.97%
EBITDA margin decline while EQT shows 100.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.64%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 31.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-152.50%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 15.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
65.10%
Other expenses growth less than half of EQT's 131.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-55.82%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 80.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-136.16%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 57.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
125.44%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x EQT's 56.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-438.75%
Net income decline while EQT shows 108.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-716.52%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 82.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-446.30%
EPS decline while EQT shows 109.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-442.59%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 106.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.79%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 0.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.