40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.84%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-7.13%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-38.48%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
G&A change of 11.11% while EQT maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.18%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.08%
Total costs growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.42%
Interest expense growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.52%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-43.56%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 3.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-64.46%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 2.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.92%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-71.40%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 1.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.24%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.92%
Tax expense growth while EQT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.25%
Net income decline while EQT shows 1.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.29%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 4.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.75%
EPS decline while EQT shows 1.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.75%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 1.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.30%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.