40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-44.59%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-27.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-54.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
G&A reduction while EQT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.41%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 30.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1.32%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of EQT's 2.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-15.29%
Total costs reduction while EQT shows 0.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.40%
Interest expense reduction while EQT shows 0.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x EQT's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
153.87%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x EQT's 116.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
358.14%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 58.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-96.32%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 680.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.36%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 725.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-420.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-892.24%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 6742.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1529.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 7133.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-791.24%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 321.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-962.12%
Net income decline while EQT shows 1279.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1655.82%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 1346.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-940.30%
EPS decline while EQT shows 1275.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-940.30%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 1283.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.25%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.