40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-33.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-17.66%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 1.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-48.52%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.80%
G&A reduction while EQT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 186.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.47%
Operating expenses reduction while EQT shows 0.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.52%
Total costs reduction while EQT shows 1.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
122.40%
Interest expense growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.45%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 1.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.78%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.16%
EBITDA margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1010.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1469.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.24%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 5.88%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.99%
Pre-tax income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.95%
Tax expense growth while EQT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
Net income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-41.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.01%
EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.01%
Diluted EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
11.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.