40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.96%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 2.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.14%
Cost reduction while EQT shows 2.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-36.13%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
G&A reduction while EQT shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
448.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 32.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
6.04%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.83%
Interest expense reduction while EQT shows 0.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.43%
D&A reduction while EQT shows 0.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
58.42%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 31.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
142.72%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of EQT's 2610.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-206.50%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 180.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-245.82%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 173.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
131.19%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.88%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
30.40%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of EQT's 636.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.70%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of EQT's 617.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.53%
Tax expense growth while EQT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.07%
Net income growth below 50% of EQT's 104.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.21%
Net margin growth below 50% of EQT's 104.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
38.02%
EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 104.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
38.57%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 104.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.10%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 2.68% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.81%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x EQT's 2.46%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.