40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.50%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
7.33%
Cost growth above 1.5x EQT's 0.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-37.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.91%
G&A growth less than half of EQT's 150.12%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.26%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 3.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
20.68%
Similar operating expenses growth to EQT's 23.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
13.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x EQT's 4.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.85%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x EQT's 14.29%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
8.81%
D&A growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.38%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
60.69%
EBITDA growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-213.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-101.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8666.67%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.63%
Pre-tax income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5800.00%
Tax expense growth while EQT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.72%
Net margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x EQT's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.