PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.04%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-45.65%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.50%
G&A growth 50-75% of EQT's 57.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13800.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 22.61%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.32%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of EQT's 48.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
12.60%
Total costs growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.31%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-11.96%
Interest expense reduction while EQT shows 9.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.09%
D&A growth less than half of EQT's 2015.02%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-72.90%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 107.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.31%
EBITDA margin decline while EQT shows 57.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-134.42%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 105.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.98%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 107.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.68%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-238.13%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 101.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 102.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-877.78%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 70.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-200.00%
Net income decline while EQT shows 101.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.57%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 101.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
EPS decline while EQT shows 101.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.75%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 101.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.86%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.18%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 0.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.