40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
28.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 4.81%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
15.95%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
46.50%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 12.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.11%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x EQT's 7.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.70%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.20%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 85.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.50%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.00%
Total costs growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.58%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of EQT's 20.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
16.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x EQT's 4.02%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
183.33%
EBITDA growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.64%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x EQT's 7.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
202.59%
Operating income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.91%
Operating margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.52%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
120.36%
Pre-tax income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.86%
Pre-tax margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.57%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x EQT's 38.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
125.83%
Net income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.12%
Net margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.00%
EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.32%
Diluted EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.20%
Share count increase while EQT reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.51%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.