PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-48.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
5.86%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-69.85%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
G&A change of 122.44% while EQT maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.67%
Other expenses reduction while EQT shows 101.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
114.83%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.36%
Total costs growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.16%
Interest expense growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.33%
D&A growth less than half of EQT's 3826.50%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-90.23%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 207.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.62%
EBITDA margin decline while EQT shows 156.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.77%
Operating income decline while EQT shows 130.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.32%
Operating margin decline while EQT shows 134.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
54.86%
Other expenses growth less than half of EQT's 142.05%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-125.95%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 132.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.04%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 136.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.94%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 138.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-123.79%
Net income decline while EQT shows 129.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.86%
Net margin decline while EQT shows 133.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
EPS decline while EQT shows 130.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
Diluted EPS decline while EQT shows 130.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
27.89%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of EQT's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.