40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.35%
Revenue decline while EQT shows 10.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.37%
Cost increase while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-31.93%
Gross profit decline while EQT shows 84.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-18.62%
Margin decline while EQT shows 86.20% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.57%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.02%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.94%
D&A growth while EQT reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
90.34%
EBITDA margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-108.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-110.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
67.48%
Similar other expenses growth to EQT's 71.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-135.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-244.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-104.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.13%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.05%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.85%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 0.06% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.02%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 0.06% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.