40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
14.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-33.60%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
G&A growth 50-75% of EQT's 13.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
14.90%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.91%
Total costs growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.50%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.79%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x EQT's 2.51%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
0.96%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x EQT's 0.84%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-60.49%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-162.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-167.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-254.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-267.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
160.23%
Tax expense growth while EQT reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-166.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-172.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-166.39%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.10%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.84%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
