40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.50%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-37.36%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
8.09%
Positive growth while EQT shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
19.43%
Margin expansion while EQT shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.20%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x EQT's 19.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
47.70%
Operating expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.97%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-24.10%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.13%
EBITDA decline while EQT shows 106.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
45.45%
Similar other expenses growth to EQT's 44.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-12.87%
Pre-tax income decline while EQT shows 170.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while EQT shows 288.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-355.68%
Tax expense reduction while EQT shows 267.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.56%
Net income growth below 50% of EQT's 150.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.37%
Net margin growth below 50% of EQT's 259.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.68%
EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 176.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.47%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of EQT's 153.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.98%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.72%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.