40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.97%
Revenue growth below 50% of EQT's 36.56%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-31.27%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
92.74%
Gross profit growth below 50% of EQT's 341.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
83.61%
Margin expansion below 50% of EQT's 276.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.49%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while EQT shows 6953.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
828.09%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of EQT's 1493.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
333.73%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of EQT's 583.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.69%
Total costs growth less than half of EQT's 21.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.90%
Interest expense reduction while EQT shows 184.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.57%
D&A growth less than half of EQT's 26.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.09%
EBITDA growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.71%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of EQT's 102.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.56%
Operating income growth 50-75% of EQT's 17.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.38%
Operating margin growth below 50% of EQT's 39.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
134.44%
Other expenses growth while EQT reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.74%
Pre-tax income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.07%
Pre-tax margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-59.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
49.12%
Net income growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.06%
Net margin growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.78%
EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.18%
Diluted EPS growth while EQT declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.54%
Share count reduction while EQT shows 26.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.53%
Diluted share reduction while EQT shows 25.78% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.