40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-29.84%
Revenue decline while OBE shows 4.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.13%
Cost reduction while OBE shows 0.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-38.48%
Gross profit decline while OBE shows 20.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.32%
Margin decline while OBE shows 15.65% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
G&A growth while OBE reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.18%
Operating expenses growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.08%
Total costs growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.42%
Interest expense change of 1.42% while OBE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-1.52%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-43.56%
EBITDA decline while OBE shows 7.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.40%
EBITDA margin decline while OBE shows 2.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.06%
Operating income decline while OBE shows 75.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.46%
Operating margin decline while OBE shows 68.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.92%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x OBE's 12.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-71.40%
Pre-tax income decline while OBE shows 180.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.24%
Pre-tax margin decline while OBE shows 176.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.92%
Tax expense growth while OBE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.25%
Net income decline while OBE shows 167.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.29%
Net margin decline while OBE shows 164.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.75%
EPS decline while OBE shows 167.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.75%
Diluted EPS decline while OBE shows 167.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.30%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OBE's 1.16%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x OBE's 0.72%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.