40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-48.13%
Revenue decline while OBE shows 24.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
5.86%
Cost increase while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-69.85%
Gross profit decline while OBE shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-41.87%
Margin decline while OBE shows 94.64% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
G&A growth while OBE reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.67%
Other expenses reduction while OBE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
114.83%
Operating expenses growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.36%
Total costs growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.16%
Interest expense growth less than half of OBE's 50.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.33%
D&A growth while OBE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-90.23%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.77%
Operating income decline while OBE shows 86.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-132.32%
Operating margin decline while OBE shows 88.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
54.86%
Other expenses growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-125.95%
Pre-tax income decline while OBE shows 52.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-150.04%
Pre-tax margin decline while OBE shows 61.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.94%
Tax expense reduction while OBE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-123.79%
Net income decline while OBE shows 52.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-145.86%
Net margin decline while OBE shows 61.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
EPS decline while OBE shows 52.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.55%
Diluted EPS decline while OBE shows 52.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of OBE's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
27.89%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of OBE's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.