40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.20%
Revenue decline while OBE shows 17.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.65%
Gross profit decline while OBE shows 214.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.39%
Margin decline while OBE shows 168.06% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.71%
G&A reduction while OBE shows 196.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
96.39%
Marketing expense growth while OBE reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
10.75%
Other expenses growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.42%
Operating expenses reduction while OBE shows 3112.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.67%
Interest expense reduction while OBE shows 5.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.78%
D&A growth above 1.5x OBE's 0.72%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-36.70%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.71%
Operating income decline while OBE shows 235.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.84%
Operating margin decline while OBE shows 185.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
45.45%
Other expenses growth while OBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-59.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-60.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.19%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.13%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.95%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.13%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.