40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.48%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-78.82%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
56.29%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
60.27%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while PR shows 15.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 7.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
26.19%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 9.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-17.84%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.02%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 6.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
112.69%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
118.11%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
674.16%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
688.77%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.69%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
306.74%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
312.00%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
370.59%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
293.08%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
298.00%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
295.08%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
293.44%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.12%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.