PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.84%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.84%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.67%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.68%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 7.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.42%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 9.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.88%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.11%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.21%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.46%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.38%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.43%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-143.79%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
236.79%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-63.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.64%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.20%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.56%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.