40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.04%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
11.95%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-10.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.91%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 7.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
8.75%
Similar operating expenses growth to PR's 9.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
11.04%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.84%
D&A growth above 1.5x PR's 6.79%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-11.07%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.50%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-25.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.59%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-35.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.91%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.58%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-7.72%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.