PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.20%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.52%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
38.86%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
24.88%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.19%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 7.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.94%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 9.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.32%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.52%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
38.11%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.98%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.15%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.00%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1749.84%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1085.14%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.13%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.61%
Diluted share increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.