40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-49.51%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.96%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
46.82%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.08%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 7.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
20.59%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 9.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-36.59%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.31%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
34.31%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
29.85%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.54%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 173.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-7.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.03%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.61%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.86%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.15%
Diluted share increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.