40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.59%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
7.03%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.33%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while PR shows 15.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.15%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 7.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
26.54%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 9.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.60%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.45%
Interest expense growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.03%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 6.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-50.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-202.97%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 173.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-304.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-295.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-303.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-305.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-296.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.17%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.17%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.