40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.90%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.19%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-35.05%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.88%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-40.07%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 9.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.46%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.82%
Interest expense growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-33.37%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
77.15%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
507.34%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
657.23%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.91%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of PR's 173.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
200.95%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
238.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
336.00%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
104.88%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
106.67%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.99%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.99%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.