40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
56.59%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.93%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
169.31%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
71.99%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.82%
G&A reduction while PR shows 15.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.33%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 7.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.35%
Similar operating expenses growth to PR's 9.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-2.41%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.08%
Interest expense growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.55%
D&A reduction while PR shows 6.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
208.30%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
102.93%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
346.02%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
257.12%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 173.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
86.38%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.06%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
93.57%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.89%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.61%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.61%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.03%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.