40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
168.96%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 17.02%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
18.29%
Cost growth 50-75% of PR's 29.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
2212.00%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 13.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
759.62%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.93%
G&A reduction while PR shows 284.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.67%
Other expenses change of 116.67% while PR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-0.66%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 284.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.45%
Total costs growth less than half of PR's 284.02%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.48%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 10.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
144.32%
Similar EBITDA growth to PR's 167.37%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-104.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
129.91%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.12%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
260.90%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 97.64%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
135.49%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.19%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.28%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
152.75%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
119.61%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
152.11%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 96.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
152.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 96.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.40%
Share count reduction below 50% of PR's 0.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PR's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.