40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.50%
Revenue decline while PR shows 49.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
5.68%
Cost growth less than half of PR's 29.20%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-25.93%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 83.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.30%
Margin decline while PR shows 22.98% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.81%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.39%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 104.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.53%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 16.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.75%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 25.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.23%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 72.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.21%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 32.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-23.73%
EBITDA decline while PR shows 80.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.41%
Operating income decline while PR shows 223.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.65%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 116.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
110.91%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of PR's 156.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-24.65%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 201.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 102.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.33%
Tax expense reduction while PR shows 395.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.20%
Net income decline while PR shows 111.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.03%
Net margin decline while PR shows 41.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.73%
EPS decline while PR shows 125.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.73%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 125.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.