PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.50%
Revenue decline while PR shows 22.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
7.33%
Cost growth less than half of PR's 27.43%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-37.39%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 16.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.91%
Similar G&A growth to PR's 29.46%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.26%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 16.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
20.68%
Similar operating expenses growth to PR's 19.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
13.52%
Total costs growth 50-75% of PR's 25.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
27.85%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of PR's 43.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
8.81%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 23.17%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
60.69%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 1.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-213.10%
EBITDA margin decline while PR shows 141.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.25%
Operating income decline while PR shows 14.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8666.67%
Other expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.63%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5800.00%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.72%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.01%
Share count increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PR's 6.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.