40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
28.38%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 7.86%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
15.95%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 12.61%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
46.50%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 3.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.11%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.70%
G&A reduction while PR shows 19.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.20%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 192.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.50%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 12.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.00%
Total costs growth less than half of PR's 12.63%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
13.58%
Similar interest expense growth to PR's 13.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
16.33%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 11.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
183.33%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.64%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
202.59%
Operating income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.91%
Operating margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.52%
Other expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
120.36%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.86%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.57%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
125.83%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.12%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.00%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.32%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.20%
Share count reduction below 50% of PR's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while PR shows 4.83% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.